Theory / GuXiaojun
2017-02-09 10:59:10
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

Theory    理论

- Gu Xiaojunist:About reason theory• 3,138

In the master "Animadvert on" weapons, you can enter a higher level of the discussion. This higher level is the "theory."

Theory, is people's understanding of things and exposition, is derived from a specific problem in the concept or principle; such concepts or principles can be applied to or guide the general debate, debate and other discourse truth.

The "Animadvert on Deng" theory referred to in the previous chapter refers to "Animadvert on" and "Deng theory". It is an abbreviation for "Animadvert on" and "Deng Xiaoping Theory", not "Animadvert on Deng" theory. Of the "Animadvert on Deng" has formed a complete "theory."

It is true that the series of articles on the "Deng Xiaoping Theory" have also reached a high level. However, the concept of guiding significance has not yet been formed in the discourse truth of using or directing general debate and debate. But also does not constitute some kind of principle of things.

In addition, the "Deng Xiaoping Theory" is unscientific. "Science and technology is the primary productive force", "feeling the stones across the river", "do not argue", "the basic line" is the " "" Poverty is not socialism, "" let some people get rich first, "" adhere to the four basic principles, "" both hands, both hands should be hard, "" stable twenty years " Common, does not constitute a theory.

"Deng Xiaoping Theory", according to "Marxism" "Mao Zedong Thought" of the order, along the list, and the second best, deduced out. I think: In fact, "Deng Xiaoping Theory", or "Deng Xiaoping thought" good. Of course, "Deng Xiaoping Thought" is not "thinking" in the sense of "Mao Zedong Thought", but "thinking" of "Deng Xiaoping".

My, to achieve a theoretical height, the more famous article, is the "Three Represents", is the baloney, is the abduction! ". In this paper, "a political party, neither the creation of material, nor the output of wealth, how to represent 'productivity'" and "culture, is a region or population, a certain period of behavior, customs, habits (including ideas What is the advanced and backward? How to determine the advanced and backward? How to determine the 'forward direction' it 'and' interest is the sub-subject and object. ') What is the meaning of this? The CCP is not the whole people's party. How can it reflect 'the fundamental interests of the overwhelming majority of the Chinese people?' And how to 'always represent' ". These are theoretical heights and can guide general discourse truths.

Shun said, "Three Represents", is the baloney, is abducted! ", Is the overseas Apollo network essay and write. The result is that He Qinglian an article won the first prize. However, He Qinglian of the text, in fact, just found the problem, which is equivalent to questioning, to find the doubt (we can look for), not yet constitute the Animadvert on, not to mention the theory. This article won the first prize, can only explain the level of Apollo network editor is too bad. The key is that, in addition to the "Three Represents", is the baloney, is abducted! "No awards, all the candidates have a prize, a few pictures have prizes, which can only prove: essay is the author of the implementation of the Apollo network fishing.

My true high-level theoretical thesis is that "the justice and conscience of the present is the standard of truth." On this article, here is not expanded, put the next article said.

Theory and theory of the article, is higher than the general Animadvert on and Animadvert on the article. Thought can be "Mao Zedong Thought" thought, it can be "Deng Xiaoping" and "thought" of thought, but also can be "thought to desalination" of ideas, and theory can only be theory, no different levels. Of course, theory, can be the correct theory, it can be gray theory, or even yellow theory, which is equivalent to different areas, non-different levels.

From a single unreasonable, from the evidence, evidence, argumentation ... ... came into the compound, into the question, and then move forward, it is necessary to innovate. Innovation requires not only courage but ability.

Gu Xiaojun 2016-10-17 Nanjing

Translator: God Has eyes

理论

 

    ——顾晓军主义:道理学·三千一百三十八

 

 

  在熟练掌握“批判”武器之后,就可以进入更高层面的探讨了。这个更高的层面,就是“理论”。

 

  理论,是人们对事物的理解与论述,是从具体问题中推演出来的概念或原理;这样的概念或原理,可运用于或指导一般的争论、辩论等的讲道理。

 

  上篇提到的“批邓理论”,是指“批”“邓理论”、是“批判”“邓小平理论”的缩写,而不是指“批邓‘理论’”、不是说我的“批邓”已经形成了完整的“理论”。

 

  诚然,我之、对“邓小平理论”批判的系列文章,也达到了相当的高度,但,于运用或指导一般的争论与辩论的讲道理而言,还没有形成一种指导意义的概念、更没有构成某种原理性的东西。

 

  另,“邓小平理论”的提法是不科学的。散乱的“不管白猫黑猫,会捉老鼠就是好猫”、“发展才是硬道理”、“科学技术是第一生产力”、“摸着石头过河”、“不争论”、“基本路线要管一百年”、“贫穷不是社会主义”、“让一部分人先富起来”、“坚持四项基本原则”、“两手抓,两手都要硬”、“稳定二十年”等,没有共性、不构成理论。

 

  “邓小平理论”,是按“马克思主义”“毛泽东思想”之序、顺其列、且退而求其次、推演出来的。我以为:其实“邓小平理论”,还是叫“邓小平思想”好。当然,“邓小平思想”、并不是“毛泽东思想”意义上的“思想”,而是指“邓小平”的“思想”。

 

  我的、达到理论高度的、较有名的文章,是《“三个代表”,是扯淡、是坑蒙拐骗!》。该文中的“一个政党,既不创造物质、也不产出财富,怎么代表‘生产力’”与“文化,是一区域或人群、一定时期内形成的行为、风俗、习惯(包括思想、理念等),是人们无意识体现出的、这区域与人的行为特征。凭什么说谁先进、谁落后?怎么界定先进与落后?又怎么判定‘前进方向’呢”及“利益是分主客体的。中共不是全民党,怎么可能体现‘中国最广大人民的根本利益’?又怎么‘始终代表’”,这些、是具有理论高度的,也是可以指导一般的讲道理的。

 

  顺说,《“三个代表”,是扯淡、是坑蒙拐骗!》、是应海外阿波罗网征文而写的。而结果,是何清涟的一篇文章得了头奖。然,何清涟的那文,实际上只是找到了问题,相当于在质疑之中、找到了疑点(大家可找来看看),既还没构成批判、更谈不上理论。这样的文章获头奖,只能说明阿波罗网编辑的水平太差。而关键,是除《“三个代表”,是扯淡、是坑蒙拐骗!》没任何奖项外,所有应征文章都有奖、连发几个图片都有奖,这、就只能证明:征文是阿波罗网对境内作者实施钓鱼。

 

  我的真正高水平的理论文章,是《现在时的公正与良知是检验真理的标准》。关于该文,这里就不展开了,放到下篇说。

 

  理论与理论文章,是高于一般性的批判与批判文章的。思想,可以是“毛泽东思想”之思想、也可以是“邓小平”的“思想”之思想,还可以是“思想开小差”之思想,而理论、只能是理论,没有不同层面之分。当然,理论、可以是正确的理论,也可以是灰色的理论,甚至还可以是黄色的理论,这相当于不同领域、非不同层面。

 

  从单一讲理,从证据、举证、论证……走来,进入复合,进入质疑、批判、理论……再往前走,就要创新了。创新,不仅需要勇气、更需要能力。

 

 

              顾晓军 2016-10-17 南京

最新文章
相关阅读