Animadverton /GuXiaojun
2017-02-05 20:04:49
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

Animadvert on 批判

- Gu Xiaojunist:About reason theory • 3137

When the "Call in question" self-training after the end, we can "critical" exercise. In fact, Call in question and Animadvert on, are often inseparable, almost the same time; However, in order to facilitate the practice, we still separate the two.

"Animadvert on" is actually - to that error, decomposition and analysis, by reasoning approach to say where the wrong, why wrong and so on.

For example, my famous "criticizing Deng Xiaoping's theory" of "a group of Deng Xiaoping: let some people get rich first" is to compare the "one country, two systems" and "let some people get rich first". Both, are to solve practical problems, are pragmatism. However, "one country, two systems" is the contradiction to the future; and "Let some people get rich first", it is to create contradictions, contradictions, has just begun.

Therefore, "let some people get rich first", in fact, can only do, but can not say, say, is to advocate; a advocate, is bound to economic reform in the "double track" flood. The "dual system" flooding, it will inevitably make money trading spread. Therefore, it can be said that the Chinese officials of the theory of corruption is caused by "let some people get rich first."

Deng Xiaoping is a proletarian revolutionist, perhaps he does not want corruption flooded; his original design, but also "let some people in China to get rich, the first rich to help the rich." However, "the first rich to help the rich", just a kind of take the socialist color for granted; the actual, not according to his idea of interpretation.

For Deng Xiaoping, "let some of the Chinese people to get rich first, to help the rich after the rich", but because of his level of thinking and theory is relatively poor, will take it for granted, but for China's reform and opening up, is the choice A re-take the old path of the vicious expansion of capitalism.

In fact, after the socialist transformation of the mainland, economic development, can and should learn from Chiang Ching-kuo, to achieve "average wealth" (1972 to 1988, per capita growth from $ 482 to $ 5,829, the highest fifth of families And the lowest one-fifth of the family's income difference, only 4.49 times fine-tuning to 4.85 times the world no other country or region can make 12 times the per capita income growth and the gap between rich and poor is limited to 8%). Chiang Ching-kuo's approach shows that wealth is not concentrated in the hands of a few people, indicating that the fruits of economic growth, shared by the whole people.

And the mainland, perhaps the total economic multiple, turned far higher than Taiwan; However, people are destitute, full of "demolitions", interception, black jail, full of Sanlu milk, Shuanghui meat, waste oil, Forced confession, head shot, hide and seek. And these, is it not "let some of China's first rich, rich first to help the rich" caused? Almost the same era, two kinds of reform, which is better at one glance it?

It is precisely because of such rational and justified reasoning that precisely because of such a critical and realistic critique that the newly completed "one Animadvert on of Deng Xiaoping: Let some people get rich first", "the second Animadvert on of Deng Xiaoping: development is not the last word" Deng Xiaoping 's theory of "Deng' s reform is to swear with the people," "four Animadvert ons of Deng Xiaoping: Deng 's reform is a change of opinion," the "Animadvert on of Deng theory" in mainland China has become a hotspot, also widely spread to overseas Chinese circle, Chinese media reports (such as "China Internet Forum openly criticized Deng Xiaoping's thinking" and "Internet Forum openly criticized Deng Xiaoping's thought sparked heated debate").

As for the background of jasmine Yang Hengjun to my unit said the "nine batches", is the thing. "Nine Batch" is imitation of the Communist Party of China "Nine Commentaries on the Communist Party of the Soviet Union."

Animadvert on, so critical. Critical way, means, etc., can be different; but, to seize the essence of the problem, the other full analysis, let the error, completely exposed, it is exactly the same, is critical of the key lies.

Gu Xiaojun 2016-10-16 Nanjing

Translator: God Has eyes

批判

 

    ——顾晓军主义:道理学•三千一百三十七

 

 

  当“质疑”的自我训练结束以后,我们就可以进行“批判”的练习了。其实,质疑与批判、往往是密不可分的、几乎同时的;但,为了便于练习、我们还是把两者分开。

 

  “批判”其实就是——对认为错误的、进行分解与分析,按说理的方法说出其哪里错、为何错等。

 

  如,我的名震一时的“批邓理论”之《一批邓小平:让一部分人先富起来》,就是从比较“一国两制”与“让一部分人先富起来”开始的。两者,都是解决实际问题、都是实用主义。但,“一国两制”是把矛盾留给将来;而“让一部分人先富起来”,则是制造矛盾、矛盾的刚刚开始。

 

  因此,“让一部分人先富起来”、其实是只能做、而决不能说,说了、就是提倡;一提倡,则必然使经济改革中的“双轨制”泛滥。而“双轨制”泛滥,也就必然会使权钱交易泛滥。因此,可以说当今中国官员的腐败的理论成因、是“让一部分人先富起来”。

 

  邓小平是无产阶级革命家,或许他并不希望腐败泛滥成灾;他的原先的设计,也是“让中国的一部分人先富,先富帮后富”。然“先富帮后富”,只是一种带社会主义色彩的想当然;而实际,并不按他的想法演绎。

 

  对于邓小平而言,“让中国的一部分人先富,先富帮后富”、不过因他的思想与理论的水平比较差、才会想当然,而对于中国的改革开放而言,则是选择了一条重走资本主义恶性膨胀的老路。

 

  其实,经过社会主义改造的大陆、的经济发展,完全可以、也更应该向蒋经国学习、实现“均富”(1972年到1988年,人均从482美元成长到5829美元,最高五分之一家庭与最低五分之一家庭的收入差,仅从4.49倍微调到4.85倍,全世界没有其他国家或地区能让人均所得成长12倍而贫富差距却限制在8%以内的)。蒋经国的做法,表明财富没有集中到少数人手中,表明经济成长的硕果、由全民共享。

 

  而大陆,或许经济总量的倍数、翻得远比台湾高;然而,却民不聊生,到处是“强拆”、截访、黑监狱,到处是三鹿奶、双汇肉、地沟油,还到处是刑讯逼供、头顶放炮、躲猫猫。而这些,难道不是“让中国的一部分人先富,先富帮后富”所造成的?几乎同一个时代,两种改革、孰优孰劣还不一目了然吗?

 

  正因为这样的有理有据的说理、正因为这样的实事求是的批判,使当时刚刚完成的《一批邓小平:让一部分人先富起来》、《二批邓小平:发展不是硬道理》、《三批邓小平:邓式改革是誓与人民为敌》、《四批邓小平:邓式改革是换汤不换药》的“批邓理论”,在大陆成为热点,也广泛传到了海外华人圈、被海外华人媒体报道(如《中国网路论坛公开批判邓小平思想》与《网路论坛公开批判邓小平思想引发热议》)。

 

  至于茉莉花背景中杨恒均到我单位说的“九批”,是后来的事。“九批”是仿中共“九评苏共”。

 

  批判,就这么批判。批判的方式、手法等等,可以不一样;但,抓住问题的实质、将对方充分剖析,让其之错误、彻底暴露,则是完全一样的,也是批判的关键之所在。

 

 

              顾晓军 2016-10-16 南京

最新文章
相关阅读