ReasonshouldbeImpartiality/GuXiaojun
2016-12-13 21:58:11
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

Reason should be Impartiality 理就该是公正

- Gu Xiaojunist:About reason theory • Three thousand one hundred and twenty-three

The continent is getting more and more concerned about the promise. In the past, it was taboo, but now it is on the CCTV news (at least, I saw a report on the physics and Chemistry Award). And I, but it's just the opposite. In the past, is eagerly awaiting the announcement; today, it may not be too concerned about.

Don't care too much, not I don't expect, but I know I'm stronger and stronger. This, but also from the ban on my more and more brutal, see. And this, not just that: I am getting closer and closer to the promise. Otherwise, what to do?

2016-10-7 Laborer said, "Mr QQ in the next year". I know: he is known, this year and lost. I said nothing, do not ask who award.

I know: 2012, is the best opportunity - originally, to give me and Ai Weiwei, high. Later, Li Tiantian spoiler. Later, Chen Guangcheng spoiler...... The results were given to the European Union.

Missed, missed. Although the dough is still in Gu unremitting efforts, but the peace prize seems to go farther and farther.

Farther and farther away, not my intention of the peace prize is getting farther and farther, but the peace prize is more and more no Impartiality at all. We want to, "international organization" can become the EU's award-winning reason? What's more, they were involved in the war. Can this be peace? And in 2013, the organization for the prohibition of chemical weapons winning grounds of "arms control and disarmament", this is nonsense? Moreover, no clear out old chemical weapons, and the use of Syria Xinhua wu. Peace Prize, not their own to play their own mouth? By 2014, even more shameless, and even the peace prize to a little liar Ma la. Ma La fame, is the Taliban shooting, bullets from the forehead of the horse pulled into the...... Since the bullet, the horse pulled the forehead of the scar, right?

No, there's no scar on the brow of the horse. So I said: This is a farce, world political elites -- by the British BBC story, Ban Ki-moon at the United Nations to engage in "malala day", President Obama met with the queen of England met malala, malala...... Finally, won the prize. The purpose is to facilitate the United Nations Children's fund sponsorship, because former British Prime Minister Brown in charge of the fund. In the end, they teamed up false - stories, quanqian.

Circle to the money, they can no good? And this, the right to speak, there are Impartiality to speak of it? Is the side of the winning side of the war is the reason, is Impartiality? Does one side side of the prohibition of chemical weapons use chemical weapons of peace? Don't cheat cheat and the prize?

Fortunately, they can not hoodwink the peace prize jury substitutions. In this way, there is the "plural democracy" of Tunisia, with the end of the 50 years of Santos's civil war ".

I just searched for the "Nobel Peace Prize", just know that Santos won the peace prize. I search the next "Nobel literature", to see the 2016 Nobel prize for literature to be postponed to 13, the final..." Among them, "the Nobel prize for literature and never buanpailichupai", then the "brand management" is what reason? Is "October 4, 2016 Ladbrokes (Ladbrokes) Nobel prize odds table, it is reasonable? So, isn't it the same as a bet?

And FIFA's corruption scandal, we will not do not know? I always have this feeling: many international organizations, including the United Nations, the continent with the "Red Cross" almost; or, good to go.

But Reason should be Impartiality. Without Impartiality, what is the reason? Right?

Gu Xiaojun 2016-10-11 Nanjing

Translator: God Has eyes

Gu Theory Book club Bookselling QQ group: 152 017 194

"Community Impartiality First" RMB 51

"Brain revolution" RMB 81 yuan

"Gu Xiaojun novelette (1)" RMB 79

"Gu Xiaojun novelette (2)" RMB 71

"Overthrow Lu Xun" RMB 49

Every two books in China Shipping charge additional RMB 6

Overseas Shipment average of RMB 10 per book, already reduce

理就该是公正

 

    ——顾晓军主义:道理学•三千一百二十三

 

 

  大陆越来越关心诺奖了。过去,是忌讳诺奖,而如今则上了央视新闻(至少,我就看到了报道物理奖和化学奖)。而我,却正好相反。过去,是眼巴巴地盼着公布;而如今,则似不太在意了。

 

  不太在意,不是我不指望了,而是清楚——我越来越强大了。这,也能从对我的封杀越来越残酷、看得出来。而这,不正说明:我离诺奖越来越近了?否则,封杀做甚?

 

  2016-10-7,劳力在QQ上对我说“先生,来年再战”。我即明白:他已知,今年又落空了。我没吭声,也没问奖给了谁。

 

  我深知:2012年,是最好的机会——原本,要给我和艾未未、高智晟的。后来,李天天搅局。再后来,陈光诚搅局……结果,人家给了欧洲联盟。

 

  错过了,就错过了。尽管顾粉团仍在不懈努力,但,似乎和平奖越走越远。

 

  越走越远,不是我离和平奖的本意越来越远,而是和平奖越来越没有公正可言。大家想,“国际组织”可以成为欧盟的获奖理由吗?何况,当年他们还参与了战争。这能算和平吗?而2013年,禁止化学武器组织获奖的理由竟是“军备控制和裁军”,这更是扯淡了吧?何况,旧化武没清除掉,叙利亚又动用新化武。和平奖,不是自己打自己的嘴巴吗?到2014年,就更无耻了,竟把和平奖给了一个小骗子马拉拉。马拉拉成名,是被塔利班枪击、子弹从马拉拉的额头射入……既然子弹射入,马拉拉的额头该有疤吧?

 

  没有,马拉拉的额头上、没有疤。所以我说:这是世界政治精英们的闹剧——由英国BBC编故事,潘基文在联合国搞“马拉拉日”,美国总统奥巴马接见马拉拉,英国女皇跟着接见马拉拉……最后,获诺奖。而目的,是便于联合国儿童基金拉赞助,因为英国前首相布朗主管这个基金。说到底,就是他们联手造假——编故事、圈钱。

 

  圈到钱,他们能没好处吗?而这,有理可讲、有公正可言吗?难道一边打仗一边获奖是理、是公正?难道一边禁止化武一边使用化武是和平?难道欺骗作假,也该获奖?

 

  幸而,他们不能一手遮天,和平奖评委会换人了。这样才有了突尼斯之“多元民主”、有了桑托斯之“结束50年内战”。

 

  我是刚搜索了“诺贝尔和平奖”,才知道桑托斯获和平奖的。我顺手搜了下“诺贝尔文学”,见到“2016年诺贝尔文学奖推迟至13日揭晓,想不到最后…”,其中有“而诺贝尔文学奖评委会又从不按牌理出牌”,那么,这“牌理”又是什么理呢?难道“2016年10月4日立博公司(Ladbrokes)诺贝尔文学奖赔率表”、就是理吗?那么,这不跟赌球一样吗?

 

  而国际足联的腐败丑闻,大家不会不知道吧?我一直有这感觉:很多国际组织、包括联合国,跟大陆的“红会”差不多;或者说,好不到哪里去。

 

  但,理就该是公正。没有公正,还算什么理呢?是不是?

 

 

              顾晓军 2016-10-11 南京

 

顾学书友 售书QQ群:152017194

《公正第一》人民币51元

《大脑革命》人民币81元

《平民主义民主》人民币49元

《顾晓军小说(一)》人民币79元

《顾晓军小说(二)》人民币71元

《打倒鲁迅》人民币49元

每2本境内邮费另加人民币6元

境外运费本均人民币10元已免

最新文章
相关阅读