Reason should be Impartiality 理就该是公正
- Gu Xiaojunist:About reason theory • Three thousand one hundred and twenty-three
The continent is getting more and more concerned about the promise. In the past, it was taboo, but now it is on the CCTV news (at least, I saw a report on the physics and Chemistry Award). And I, but it's just the opposite. In the past, is eagerly awaiting the announcement; today, it may not be too concerned about.
Don't care too much, not I don't expect, but I know I'm stronger and stronger. This, but also from the ban on my more and more brutal, see. And this, not just that: I am getting closer and closer to the promise. Otherwise, what to do?
2016-10-7 Laborer said, "Mr QQ in the next year". I know: he is known, this year and lost. I said nothing, do not ask who award.
I know: 2012, is the best opportunity - originally, to give me and Ai Weiwei, high. Later, Li Tiantian spoiler. Later, Chen Guangcheng spoiler...... The results were given to the European Union.
Missed, missed. Although the dough is still in Gu unremitting efforts, but the peace prize seems to go farther and farther.
Farther and farther away, not my intention of the peace prize is getting farther and farther, but the peace prize is more and more no Impartiality at all. We want to, "international organization" can become the EU's award-winning reason? What's more, they were involved in the war. Can this be peace? And in 2013, the organization for the prohibition of chemical weapons winning grounds of "arms control and disarmament", this is nonsense? Moreover, no clear out old chemical weapons, and the use of Syria Xinhua wu. Peace Prize, not their own to play their own mouth? By 2014, even more shameless, and even the peace prize to a little liar Ma la. Ma La fame, is the Taliban shooting, bullets from the forehead of the horse pulled into the...... Since the bullet, the horse pulled the forehead of the scar, right?
No, there's no scar on the brow of the horse. So I said: This is a farce, world political elites -- by the British BBC story, Ban Ki-moon at the United Nations to engage in "malala day", President Obama met with the queen of England met malala, malala...... Finally, won the prize. The purpose is to facilitate the United Nations Children's fund sponsorship, because former British Prime Minister Brown in charge of the fund. In the end, they teamed up false - stories, quanqian.
Circle to the money, they can no good? And this, the right to speak, there are Impartiality to speak of it? Is the side of the winning side of the war is the reason, is Impartiality? Does one side side of the prohibition of chemical weapons use chemical weapons of peace? Don't cheat cheat and the prize?
Fortunately, they can not hoodwink the peace prize jury substitutions. In this way, there is the "plural democracy" of Tunisia, with the end of the 50 years of Santos's civil war ".
I just searched for the "Nobel Peace Prize", just know that Santos won the peace prize. I search the next "Nobel literature", to see the 2016 Nobel prize for literature to be postponed to 13, the final..." Among them, "the Nobel prize for literature and never buanpailichupai", then the "brand management" is what reason? Is "October 4, 2016 Ladbrokes (Ladbrokes) Nobel prize odds table, it is reasonable? So, isn't it the same as a bet?
And FIFA's corruption scandal, we will not do not know? I always have this feeling: many international organizations, including the United Nations, the continent with the "Red Cross" almost; or, good to go.
But Reason should be Impartiality. Without Impartiality, what is the reason? Right?
Gu Xiaojun 2016-10-11 Nanjing
Translator: God Has eyes
Gu Theory Book club Bookselling QQ group: 152 017 194
"Community Impartiality First" RMB 51
"Brain revolution" RMB 81 yuan
"Gu Xiaojun novelette (1)" RMB 79
"Gu Xiaojun novelette (2)" RMB 71
"Overthrow Lu Xun" RMB 49
Every two books in China Shipping charge additional RMB 6
Overseas Shipment average of RMB 10 per book, already reduce
顾晓军 2016-10-11 南京